Skip to contents

Overview

Unvalidated Experimental

This family is best read alongside the swimbladder-less fish and composite-scatterer literature that motivates explicit flesh-body and backbone terms (Gorska, Ona, and Korneliussen 2005; Stanton et al. 1998; Clay and Horne 1994).

The body-backbone fish model (BBFM) is the package’s composite swimbladder-less family for targets whose flesh body and backbone should remain explicit acoustic components.

Core idea

Compute a weak-fluid flesh-body term with DWBA, compute an elastic backbone term with ECMS, place the backbone inside the same body-fixed frame with a two-way phase factor, and then sum the two complex amplitudes coherently.

Best for

  • Swimbladder-less fish where the backbone should remain acoustically explicit
  • Composite body-plus-backbone studies that are too structured for a body-only approximation
  • Intermediate modeling between weak-fluid body models and future fully coupled composite solvers

Supports

  • BBF scatterers built from explicit body_shape and backbone_shape inputs
  • Flesh-body material properties as contrasts or absolute density/sound speed
  • Backbone density plus longitudinal and transverse elastic wave speeds

Main assumptions

  • Flesh body treated in the weak-fluid DWBA regime
  • Backbone treated as an elastic cylinder through ECMS
  • Components combined coherently after centroid-based phase placement
  • No repeated rescattering or fully coupled embedded elastic-cylinder solve

Validation status

  • BBFM is currently marked experimental because it has documented internal reconstruction checks but no external benchmark ladder or independent public implementation comparison.

Family pages

  • Implementation: object setup, stored outputs, and internal reconstruction checks
  • Theory: composite amplitude, phase placement, and interference structure

BBFM is already useful as a transparent composite family, but it should still be treated as experimental. The main open work is external validation and, in the longer term, a more tightly coupled treatment of the backbone as an embedded elastic structure rather than a positioned component surrogate.

Why it exists

BBFM fills the gap between:

  • body-only weak-scattering models that ignore the backbone,
  • and future fully coupled body-plus-backbone solvers that are not yet in the package.

That is why the family belongs in acousticTS even before a more complete composite solver exists: it gives a physically interpretable way to keep the two dominant anatomical components explicit in one coherent target-strength calculation.

References

Clay, Clarence S., and John K. Horne. 1994. “Acoustic Models of Fish: The Atlantic Cod (Gadus Morhua).” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 96 (3): 1661–68. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.410245.
Gorska, Natalia, Egil Ona, and Rolf Korneliussen. 2005. “Acoustic Backscattering by Atlantic Mackerel as Being Representative of Fish That Lack a Swimbladder. Backscattering by Individual Fish.” ICES Journal of Marine Science 62 (5): 984–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icesjms.2005.03.010.
Stanton, Timothy K., Dezhang Chu, Peter H. Wiebe, Linda V. Martin, and Robert L. Eastwood. 1998. “Sound Scattering by Several Zooplankton Groups. I. Experimental Determination of Dominant Scattering Mechanisms.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 103 (1): 225–35. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.421469.